Lasers For Vitiligo

  • Best Results4-12 months
  • Treatment Recovery1-6 days
  • Procedure Time2-10 minutes
  • Skin SpecialistDermatologist
  • Duration of ResultsVariable
  • AnaestheticNumbing
  • Back to Work1-5 days
  • Cost$-$$

Lasers For Vitiligo

Lasers including excimer 308 nm & fractional lasers are novel treatments for vitiligo. They should be viewed as last line management before surgical revision or Recell therapy. They remain as research modalities and are academic. Read more to understand why I prefer phototherapy as first line management for vitiligo.

FactsFact on lasers for vitiligo

  • Laser therapy is a novel treatment for vitiligo
  • The most widely studied is the 308-excimer laser
  • Fractional lasers have also been used in recalcitrant cases of vitiligo
  • Narrowband UVB is covered under Medicare
  • Combination therapy with creams & phototherapy gives the best result
  • The biggest downside of laser is the costs as it is not covered under Medicare
  • Phototherapy achieves similar results compared to lasers, without expense

How do lasers treat vitiligo?

There are two main types of lasers used for vitiligo. The most popular is excimer 308. This delivers monochromatic light to the areas devoid of pigmentation. This laser can-

  1. Suppress the inflammation in the upper layers of skin.
  2. Stimulate pigment cells to produce more pigment.
  3. Stimulate melanocytes to migrate from the hair follicle & surrounding skin.
  4. Stimulate germ stem cells to differentiate & from pigment producing cells.

Another laser for vitiligo is termed fractional laser resurfacing. This laser works by-

  1. Stimulation of germ cells from the hair follicle.
  2. Non-selective destruction of melanocytes or pigment cells.
  3. Stimulation of new melanocytes.
  4. Providing increased absorption of topicals including psoralen & anti-inflammatories.

How good are lasers in the context of vitiligo?

They do not offer an advantage over narrowband phototherapy. The advantage of excimer laser is the fact that it can treat discrete areas, whilst sparing unaffected skin. This reduces exposure to normal skin & can reduce colour discrepancies due to tanning.

The major disadvantage of lasers is that they are not covered under Medicare. One trial of excimer 308 involving 50 sessions is just over $10,000 AUD. Compared this to narrowband phototherapy with a cost of zero dollars (believe it or not it is fully covered under Medicare in Australia). The results from excimer 308 & phototherapy are comparable. If you are so inclined for me to use a laser, I will do so, however it does put you out of pocket close to 20K per year.

I have used fractional lasers in the context of vitiligo over the past 12 years. I have had very little in the way of success. Fractional lasers may have a role in increasing absorption of certain chemicals including psoralens. 

Why is phototherapy a better option?

As reflected in the literature, phototherapy gives similar outcomes compared to excimer lasers, with much less expense. The downside of phototherapy is the fact that unaffected skin is also treated. With careful use of sunscreen & clothing, collateral treatment areas can be minimised.

Another factor that favours phototherapy is the cost. In Australia, Medicare covers this treatment, saving patients over $7,900 per year. Factor 2 years treatment, & the cost saving is tremendous. Excimer 308 by definition is 3 nanometres away from narrowband phototherapy. This means there is no Medicare cover. 


What is my experience with lasers for vitiligo?

I have used both excimer 308 & fractional lasers to treat vitiligo. I do agree with the papers that 308 excimer offers little advantage in the context of end results. My experience with lasers for vitiligo is summarized below-

Excimer laser: is a novel treatment. The advantage of this laser is the ability to treat smaller areas without exposure to UVB to unaffected areas. Used cautiously, it does not increase the incidence of blistering. The time taken to treat (including chit-chatting to the patient) ranges from 5 to 12 minutes. The number of sessions for response is about 20-30 sessions. It is not cost effective for the patient as each treatment is around $200. Phototherapy is more efficient & provides similar results. This is reflected in the literature. The cost for Medicare card holders is zero.

Fractional Erbium & CO2 lasers. I have done a trial on 10 patients. I have only had a good result in one. Again, given the time & expense, phototherapy is a better option. Fractional lasers can be used to increase absorption of psoralens; however, this is largely academic. Recent studies have demonstrated that simple microneedling is equally, if not more effective compared to fractional laser resurfacing.


Davin’s Viewpoint on Lasers & Vitiligo

Been there and done that. I had the excimer 308 back in 2015. Illumination of affected areas of vitiligo with sparing of non-affected skin is an advantage. This advantage is lost when there are large areas involved. Used cautiously the increased rate of blistering (often quoted as 15-27%) is not seen. The downside is that with conservative fluences, more treatments are required. As reflected in the literature the result is not superior to narrowband phototherapy. The current literature supports 2-3 treatments per week, for a total of 50 trial treatments.

The disadvantage of excimer is the cost to the patients, as by definition this is not narrowband UVB (UVB adds another 3 nanometres to the excimer wavelength). This 3 nm difference accounts for $10,000 AUD difference expenses over 6 months. That’s 20K per year!

Join the conversation

Join Dr Davin Lim on Instagram to stay up to date


Enquire now!

Get In Touch

Quick Contact

Dr Lim has unparalleled experience in dermatology. Fill in the form below and he will get back to you with your query